Restore GB News

---

GB News censored Rupert Lowe’s interview with Jacob Rees-Mogg - cutting the explosive part regarding Reform's attempt to put Rupert in prison.Watch the censored section below.The interview was pre-recorded with a clear agreement it would air unedited. Instead, the most critical section was removed and replaced with a VPN advert - the only ad in the entire video.What was cut? The armed police raid on Rupert’s home, the seizure of his guns, and Farage’s own admission it was “brutal” - all because Rupert wants to deport foreign child rapists.GB News bills itself as 'Britain's News Channel'. It has a duty to cover major political stories and let viewers hear both sides - not protect one man’s interests.Restore Britain is a registered party and a fast-growing national movement with huge support. The British people deserve the truth.Enough is enough. Hold GB News to account.Use our template below to email them. It takes just two minutes. Share this everywhere.

Recording of censored section

Address a new email to

[email protected]

Set the subject as

FORMAL COMPLAINT: Censorship of Rupert Lowe Interview

Copy the template below

I am writing to raise a formal complaint regarding the clear censorship of Rupert Lowe’s recent pre-recorded interview with Jacob Rees-Mogg on GB News.The interview was agreed to be aired unedited and in full. However, the most explosive section was deliberately cut and replaced with a VPN advert — the only advertisement in the entire video. This removed Rupert Lowe’s account of the armed police raid on his home, the seizure of his guns, and Nigel Farage’s own admission that Reform UK’s attempt to have him imprisoned was “brutal” — all because of Rupert’s strong stance on deporting foreign child rapists and their accomplices.This is not impartial editing. It is selective censorship that protects one individual’s interests while denying viewers critical information on a major political story.GB News presents itself as “Britain’s News Channel” and claims to champion free speech and open debate. Removing key parts of a pre-agreed interview and hiding a story of significant public interest is inconsistent with those claims and with your own Editorial Charter on due impartiality.I would therefore ask the following:1. Why was the critical section of the Rupert Lowe interview removed and replaced with an advert?2. Whether this decision was made to protect Nigel Farage, who is a shareholder in GB News.3. That GB News immediately commits to airing the full, unedited interview.4. That the channel invites Rupert Lowe on air for a proper, unfiltered discussion about Restore Britain and the issues raised.5. That GB News reaffirms its commitment to genuine free speech rather than selective narrative protection.Viewers expect better from GB News. Many are increasingly frustrated by what appears to be protection of certain figures at the expense of honest journalism.I look forward to your response and hope you will address this matter by releasing the full interview and giving Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain fair coverage.Yours sincerely

Send the email

Thank you for your support in this campaign.

Campaign Organiser

• @WooshVibe

With support from

• @SchoolOfBritain
• @LondonVoice_